Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:52

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Dog attacks on postal workers are the most they’ve been in 7 years - NBC News
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What are your views on music video reactors on YouTube?
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
I'm British and feel ashamed of the crimes of British colonialism. What should I do?
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Astronomers Just Discovered The Biggest Explosions Since The Big Bang - ScienceAlert
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How Mark Walter’s billions could help the Lakers gain an edge on the court - Silver Screen and Roll